We choose platform and workflow based on the client’s landscape and service goals, not by forcing a single toolset. The solution should fit the users, governance, content needs and integrations, while aligning with delivery constraints. Where it makes sense, we prototype and test pipelines and publishable processes, and we’ve documented how Azure-based pipelines can be integrated with Drupal in published work. This kind of pattern is used when it fits the problem and the client’s environment, not as a one-size-fits-all rule.
Public Q&A
How do you pick the CMS and publishing workflow for a project?
Useful next steps
Use this answer as a practical starting point. Current scope, specifications, compatibility, availability, pricing, timing and next steps should be confirmed directly with Annex where they affect a decision.
Related visual examples
Content Management & PublishingA content manager reviewing structured content in a clean CMS while the published version appears on…
Visual exampleLaptop screen displaying brand color guide and palette details
Visual exampleLaptop screen showing Australian government COVID-19 and border information
Content Migration WorkflowA content migration workflow scene showing legacy pages, structured content fields and a new publish…
Metadata Enrichment & SearchA search-focused content workshop where metadata, tags and document relationships are being refined …
Client Handover & CMS EnablementAn Annex consultant guiding client staff through a newly delivered CMS and admin workflow, with conf…
